Protected by Copyscape Duplicate Content Check

Subscribe by Email and get notified about new postings as soon as they happen!

Your email:

Check Out This DVD About RRP Work Practices

This DVD, produced by Chris Zorzy, contains great time saving solutions for complying with the RRP Rule.   Chris shares a variety of containment strategies that will help keep your jobsites clean, reduce job costs and meet RRP requirements

Looking For RRP Forms and Signage?

Shawn has reviewed these forms, helped the provider enhance the forms and recommends them as a great option for those who want to use paper forms to document compliance with the EPA RRP rule.

Lead Paint Fors Store Banner

LeadPaint FormsStore.com

Browse Topics by Tag

I just wanted to say thank you for your efforts to keep us informed.

"Thank you again for the hundreth time for keeping a vigil on this business nightmare. Your site is one of the best resources we have to stay on level ground" 

Christian Peter

 

"I am quite impressed with all the confusion out there at Shawn McCadden’s clear and concise voice that continues to help contractors and those involved in this industry truly understand the rule. His efforts should be applauded." 

Christopher Wagner, LBPFiles

 

"RRPedia is an accurate and contractor friendly interpretation of the very complex and confusing EPA RRP rule"

 

"Thanks for taking the time to write the blog.  It's about the only place one can go to get some serious info on this dreadful subject"

Suggest or Contribute a RRPedia Topic

Want a Simple Summary of the EPA RRP?

Shawn McCadden has created an EPA RRP Summary for Remodelers.

"Hi Shawn, Nice RRP write up on the website.   I've already forwarded a link to it to a number of local builder types."  

Click here to go to the summary.  You can also download it if you want your own copy.

Add this widget to your Web page, blog, or social networking site. A widget is a CDC.gov application that displays the featured content directly on your web page. Click the buttons to see the next tip to prevent lead poisoning.


 

Welcome to RRPedia
Your Interactive Resource for EPA RRP Information

Looking for accurate information about the EPA RRP rule?

RRPedia RRPedia logohas been created by Shawn McCadden to help remodelers and others affected by the New EPA Renovation Repair and Painting Rule. 

Please read RRPedia Use and Contribution Information before using or contributing to RRPedia

Be sure to Read Shawn's Remodeling Magazine Blogs about the EPA RRP Rule.  Click here to see a list

Keep checking back.  Information about a wide range of RRP-related topics will continue to be added. 


You Can Browse For RRP Topics By Using The Tags List To The Right

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

EPA Publishes First RRP Enforcement of Lead Safe Work Practices

  
  
  
  

Please read RRPedia Use and Contribution Information before using or contributing to RRPedia

EPA Publishes First RRP Enforcement of Lead Safe Work Practices

Today the EPA announced it's first enforcement actions against a renovator for violations of the lead-safe work practices required under the RRP Rule.  

RRP EnforcementThe press release below explains how the violator was investigated after a YouTube video of the the renovator's workers in action was posted showing the total lack of lead-safe work practices in place as the workers used power equipment to remove paint on a rental property on Rockland ME.  

EPA’s investigation found that Mr. Wentworth failed to: obtain required certification as a renovation firm from EPA; post warning signs in the work area; cover the ground in the work area with plastic sheeting to collect falling lead paint debris; contain waste from the renovation activities to prevent releases of dust and debris before the waste is removed from the work area for storage or disposal; prohibit use of machines that remove lead-based paint through high speed operation without HEPA exhaust controls; and establish and maintain records necessary to demonstrate compliance with the Renovation Rule.  

Click here to watch the video which provided all the evidence the EPA needed.

RRP Inspections and auditsWill this be the first of many press releases by EPA regarding enforcement?   Many contractors who have complied with the RRP rule hope so.  According to Curt Spalding, regional administrator of EPA’s New England office: "Enforcement of these rules is important to protecting children and the business interests of those contractors who are following the rules.” 

Time will tell if anyone else at EPA other Curt Spalding recognizes the importance of enforcement. 


RRP enforcment in Maine

 

News Release
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
New England Regional Office
May 16, 2011

Contact: David Deegan, (617) 918-1017

Maine Renovator Faces Penalty for Violations of Lead Renovation Rule

(Boston, Mass. – May 16, 2011) – A Rockland, Maine renovator is facing penalties for allegedly violating requirements designed to protect children from exposure to lead-based paint during painting and other renovation activities.

According to information gathered by inspectors from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration and EPA, two workers employed by Colin Wentworth of Rockland failed to contain dust and debris generated by lead paint removal activities during a repainting project in October 2010.  Although Mr. Wentworth had completed the eight-hour course required by the Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) Rule, he did not provide the required training or supervision to his employees to ensure that they followed the required work practices prior to their use of high-speed dust-generating power tools to remove lead paint from the building.  Mr. Wentworth also failed to take steps to obtain the mandatory lead-safe certification for his firm. 

The violations were brought to EPA’s attention via an anonymous tip linking to a video of the violations, posted on YouTube and taken in October 2010.  The video documented workers using power equipment to remove lead paint from an exterior wall of a residential building without using any containment for lead-containing dust and debris. 

At least six children, one of whom was under six years old, lived in the four-unit building at the time of the project.  Infants and young children are especially vulnerable to lead paint exposure, which can cause developmental impairment, reading and learning disabilities, impaired hearing, reduced attention span, hyperactivity and behavioral problems.  Adults with high lead levels can suffer difficulties during pregnancy, high blood pressure, nerve disorders, memory problems and muscle and joint pain.

EPA’s investigation found that Mr. Wentworth failed to: obtain required certification as a renovation firm from EPA; post warning signs in the work area; cover the ground in the work area with plastic sheeting to collect falling lead paint debris; contain waste from the renovation activities to prevent releases of dust and debris before the waste is removed from the work area for storage or disposal; prohibit use of machines that remove lead-based paint through high speed operation without HEPA exhaust controls; and establish and maintain records necessary to demonstrate compliance with the Renovation Rule. 

“In New England we have a high proportion of older houses where lead paint can still be present.  It is critically important that all tradespeople understand and follow the RRP requirements so that during renovations, children are not exposed to lead and face serious, life-long health consequences,” said Curt Spalding, regional administrator of EPA’s New England office. “Many renovation firms have done the right thing by becoming certified, sending their employees to training and following the appropriate, health-protective work practices.  Enforcement of these rules is important to protecting children and the business interests of those contractors who are following the rules.”

EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule is designed to prevent exposure to lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards.  The rule requires individuals performing renovations for compensation at most pre-1978 housing to be properly trained.  There are certification and training requirements for individual renovators and firms performing renovations to ensure that safe work practices are followed during renovations.

This is the first action EPA has brought against a company or individual for lead safe work-practice violations, under the Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule which became effective on April 22, 2010. The maximum penalty for the alleged violations is $37,500 per violation per day.

This case highlights the importance of high-quality tips that include the name, address, and phone number of the person who allegedly violated the rule, and contain details about the violations observed.  While every such tip doesn’t always result in a formal enforcement action, EPA follows through on tips to identify if violations have occurred and if public or environmental health has been jeopardized. 

- Report environmental violation tips anywhere in the USA (http://www.epa.gov/compliance/complaints/index.html)

- Report lead hazard tips in New England: (http://www.epa.gov/region1/enforcement/leadpaint/RenovationRepairPaintComplaintForm.html)

More information:

- Lead paint RRP rule (http://epa.gov/lead/pubs/renovation.htm)

- Why lead is a health hazard (http://epa.gov/lead/pubs/leadinfo.htm#health)

#  #  #

 

If you are looking for forms and signage to help you with comply with the EPA RRP rule, I recommend you check out what The Lead Paint Forms Store has to offer.  They offer a complete assortment of multi-part carbon forms, signage and checklists to assist you and your employees with RRP compliance

Comments

I saw this months ago and commented on it. Now I will encourage other walkers and drivers to snap photos and videos when they see violations in their neighborhoods. Sometimes YouTube can be a wonderful educational tool...and unrefutable evidence!
Posted @ Monday, May 16, 2011 1:37 PM by Catherine Brooks
Chuck 
 
How do you propose a blatent disregard for the law be addressed? 
Posted @ Monday, May 16, 2011 2:17 PM by Gene
Gene, please note that Chuck's comment was deleted and I asked he consider re-phrasing and then re-posting it. Opinions are always welcome, however I ask that all commenters remain respectful in their language and or references.
Posted @ Monday, May 16, 2011 2:22 PM by Shawn McCadden
Like you, I was stunned when I first watched the video and all I can say now is that its about time! This violation is made all the worse by knowing that the firm's owner had gone through the certification class but still chose not to comply. Thank you for this important update - I've "shared" your post to help spread the word.
Posted @ Monday, May 16, 2011 2:36 PM by Michelle Freiberger
Government intrusion into our lives is why we are a third rate country now. 
 
Dubious studies with predetermined outcomes sighted to justify more government jobs.  
 
In any event if this guy were an illegal alien no charges would have been levied. NO MONEY IN IT. (ask any honest Cop about their ticketing practices) 
 
America? Give me a break! Wake up and see the death of your nation. 
 
Big Sis, Fusion Centers, Crushing Debt, Endless Illegal Wars, Prosecutors lie and put a known innocent man on death row and are held harmless by our "Supreme Court." 
 
Law? Kneel like a good servant to your masters, lick their fingers and beg to turn on your fellow man. 
 
I am so sick of this crap that I retired. More men out of work.  
 
It has gotten so bad that the best financial and trend forecasters are unanimous in the opinion that the best thing to do is leave this country. 
 
By the time you wake up the chains will be so tightly wrapped around your throat that you will just OBEY. 
 
I suggest you read or listen to "The Law" by Frederic Bastiat. It is available free in print or audio on line or on UTUBE. 
 
The law indeed. More bureaucracy, more $$ for your rulers. More control over the pliant American't.  
 
 
 
Posted @ Monday, May 16, 2011 2:52 PM by Chuck smith
While it appears Chuck has several axes to grind, I do agree that the RRP law as written is overkill. In the New York study which is the basis for the law, professional renovations in the pre-1978 units account for 6% of the renovations where the remainder where completed by home owners. That leaves me scratching my head as to why 94% of lead based renovations are excluded. Further, the elimination of owner opt-out has really angered many of my customers. Their feeling is, okay you've warned me of the dangers, now, Mr. Government, go away.
Posted @ Tuesday, May 17, 2011 12:30 PM by Joe P
Here's What I read in the EPA press release: “Two workers employed by Colin Wentworth of Rockland, ME failed to contain dust and debris generated by lead paint removal activities during a repainting project in October 2010” The owner got certified, but his firm was not, and no one with RRP certification was on the job supervising his employees did not. There were six kids living in the house, one under 6 years old. Here’s a free webinar from Benjamin Moore. You may want to sign up for this one. https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/908869787 
 
 
 
 
 
Posted @ Tuesday, May 17, 2011 3:47 PM by Sully Garrity
Hot update on the webinar; the link above says the Webinar is over!
Posted @ Tuesday, May 17, 2011 4:18 PM by Catherine Brooks
Why doesn't the individual or whoever filmed the horrific act of rennovation take the camera to the nearest abortion clinic and film that. Ball park figures are 1.67 million yearly. With these abortions, its not about the potencial threat to life but the actual "ending" of it. If the government is so damned dedicated to preserving life and safety will somebody please explain how they justify this.
Posted @ Wednesday, May 18, 2011 7:53 PM by Christian Peter
Follow the $$$$.
Posted @ Thursday, May 19, 2011 5:37 AM by Chuck Smith
Well, we go from Chuck who makes some points, to Joe who gets it, to abortion. 
 
I am with Joe on this one. Many are. 
 
Its too bad really that this rule is becoming so devisive. 
 
I am leaning towards not discussing this except in private because when we start reporting offenders will we only report the unlicensed guys or also our friends in the NAHB and NARI? 
Driving around the Twin Cities I pass guys with licenses removing windows and doors and no containment to be seen. That's from the street, indoors will even be worse. 
Yesterday I talked to a homebuilder who is replacing windows on a job I will inspect, I mentioned the RRP and he said he wasn't aware of the rule.???
Posted @ Thursday, May 19, 2011 10:52 AM by Paul Lesieur
Sorry Mr. Peter but I do not think your comment has anything to do with the discussion at hand. My understanding is that we are talking about lead poisoning. 
I have worked in the trades for over 35 years and have always tried to protect myself and the clients from hazardous situations. But I truly believe that the EPA has gone overboard on the RRP law. What does OSHA think about workers having to set up ladders on sheets of plastic? What about if there is snow on the ground or it is raining? I was told (by the trainer)that I should not do the job if those conditions are present. The companies that I have worked for, work all year long no matter what the weather is doing.  
I think we will see an increase in worker injuries there by increasing the number of claims which will increase the cost of insurance which will then force businesses to close because they can not afford to do the work anymore. Also, as I had mentioned in another discussion, what about the impact to the landfills with all the additonal plastic being disposed? 
What about the fact that the RRP law does not require the workers to wear protective gear, it is optional. So the workers are contaminating their own homes and families. To me the RRP law does not work, who is it really protecting? No one!
Posted @ Thursday, May 19, 2011 11:29 AM by Gregg Day
I think we are missing the forest for the trees when it comes to RRP. 
 
Nothing Really New 
Other than a couple of extra pieces of paper and the fact you we will now be held accountable through certification, there is nothing new in the RRP rule. It just makes it harder to ignore the rules already in place. 
 
Pre Renovation Education 
Contractors have been required to give customers the pamphlet Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home (PDF) since 1985. Landlords and Real Estate agents are still required to pass out this pamphlet. So now contractors will pass out Renovate Right: Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Providers, and Schools - April 2010 (PDF). 
 
http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/brochure.htm 
 
Lead Safe Work Practices 
Lead Safe Work Practices have been around since Title X in the 90’s.  
http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/affordablehousing/training/web/leadsafe/keyrequirements/safepractices.cfm 
 
Other Regulating Agencies 
Regulations and other directives and guidelines have been issued by HUD, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) of the U.S. Department of Labor, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  
 
Other Federal agencies, as well as State and local governments, also issue regulations and other directives pertaining to housing under their jurisdictions.  
 
Regulations generally specify minimum requirements for what must be done and when, minimum training and certification requirements for those conducting the work, and certain basic standards as to how work must be done. 
 
OSHA has had lead rules for Standards in Construction for years as well. http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10030 
http://www.osha.gov/dea/lookback/lead-construction-review.html#_Toc165376485 
 
Note: EPA does not make a big deal about the OSHA rules in the RRP course because they presume you are already compliant with OSHA 
Posted @ Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:33 PM by Gene
Greg, have to clarify myself. I completely agree with you. This rule is counter-productive. Your points are all valid. If a homeowner wishes to do their own work , they may without RRP procedure. Many of my customers are older individuals with no kids at home. Now, regardless, any remodeling will cost them more even though no kids will be affected. As far as abortion. This rrp law is to protect young people from illness. How can the epa mandate this kind of thinking when 1.67 million "lives" are off-ed in an abortion clinic. I was being satirical when I said "horrific" about the remodeling that was filmed without RRP process. Now, as a result of this new law, taking paint off an old house is like poisening the water. This is blatant hypocrisy, its putting people out of business and decreasing home values across the land. We haven't seen the long term affects of this law yet. Sorry for the misunderstanding, but this law is hurting me just as much as anybody. I've been in business for over 24 years, I've never had such a dim view of the future.  
 
Christian Peter
Posted @ Thursday, May 19, 2011 7:31 PM by Christian Peter
be careful tornado victims, and contractors, lead paint dust til the cows come home, clean up is extremely bad
Posted @ Friday, June 10, 2011 2:20 PM by jim Raymond
Well, I just had to pass on a job. Young couple- two kids, 1950 home. Lead present.  
 
I will not take this job. They can't afford all the extras it would take, and I won't loose everything I own when two years from now they see a Lawyer advertisment saying, "Get rich, have your kids tested for lead and sue the evil, rich, contractor!
Posted @ Tuesday, July 26, 2011 11:55 AM by Chuck
Have any of you people wringing your hands over "keeping kids safe" and accusing those concerned with the over-regulation of our livelyhood actually read the RRP rule? Read all of the paperwork generated by this? Read all of the requirements, the nit-picky details that can all add up to a "violation" if you are actually trying to get something done? 
 
 
 
Just for once, I'd like to see the government apply this kind of regulatory action to lawyers, beaurocrats, and special interest groups like Sierra. Maybe if they had to get certified in common sence, we would be free of the stupidity that always seems to be a major part of what would otherwise be a really good idea.
Posted @ Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:15 PM by Chris
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics